Tom, thanks for posting that transcription of the black book. Now that I’ve read it again, It’s now clear to me that the “Devils Hole” was not only a feature of the canyon, but a specific view had by the writer, of the play of firelight on the dark canyon walls.
So, yes, it appears only in specific conditions: at night, fire in the canyon bottom, viewer high above on the canyon walls. Bet they are the only ones to have ever seen it…
TPax
Thanks, guys, for the info! I REALLY hope people getting ready for Heaps get to read this. I did some reading before we went, but I didn’t find anything on the “Devil’s Hole” until I got back and REALLY started looking for it. It would have saved us a LOT of trouble had I known these things before.
I read a thread on bogley where someone said that “Good judgement comes from surviving bad judgement.” This one was probably a closer call than I would have liked, but the lessons have been (and are still being) learned. Hopefully others get to learn from it too.
Happy canyons everyone!
And no I haven’t yet, Hank, but I hope to. Gotta get back on the horse, I guess. We’ll make sure to go with someone who’s been there before though. I’d hate to end up in another news report from the park…
hank moon
TPax, thanks for the first-hand info and good on y’all for climbing outta there. Have you been back? That final rap sequence is not to be missed!
Will have to photo-document that area next time I’m in there (soon)…and will post up with clear view of drain-path from the “Hole” area
Mountaineer
Thanks for chiming in TPax. That pic does give some perspective on the event. Will help many who silently lurk and read this before they descend Heaps. Those statistics will remain hidden, but I’m sure it will help quite a few parties out there.
The thread actually reminds us of some possibilities. There may be events like rockfalls, floods, or even earthquakes that can change a canyon. Simple navigation can become thought provoking. That GPS may not work! That is, I believe many of us have always thought that once you confirm the right canyon head, the navigation is over until the exit. Something to ponder.
Welcome to Canyon Collective.
Bootboy
In the top picture, the exit is through a narrow slot on the left wall that has a log jammed in it vertically. You have to climb 5+ feet up and over the log, depending on the water level. It can be a very tough climb out. If you take the time to survey it, you realize that the canyon has to go somewhere, and it does. I was confused at this spot in the canyon as well for a minute. The exit actually looks like a tributary.
Last summer, we had to do a partner assist out of the hole and I had to do some hand-jamming between the log and the rock to get on top of the log. I crammed myself in the slot and ferried packs, then helped everyone out. It was one of the tougher moves in the canyon at the time.
Lower water would make it much tougher and less obvious. But common sense should tell you that the water flows down hill somewhere.
LNT
TPax
So, I’m afraid to admit it, but I was in that party of 3… (please save the stoning for later… I don’t have any kids yet)
I’m just reading all this for the first time, but I thought I’d chime in and maybe share some insights that will help keep people from making the same mistakes we did. That being said, I have some pictures that I took on our way out. Perhaps these will shed some light on what the Devil’s Pit looks like:
This is the view from the “30 foot obstacle” we apparently stayed on. Looks more like 6 feet to me. Semantics…
We dropped into the pool from the canyon on the right. From what people are saying here, am I to understand that the exit to this canyon is actually where the log is wedged in the canyon opposite where I’m standing? I totally get that canyons don’t just “dead end.” I’m not THAT naive/stupid (though I know some would disagree). We could just not figure out where all the water drained, and it sounds like I’m not the only one.
This is the view looking up-canyon. This is the first of the 3 pitches we climbed to get to the bench. Try not to laugh too hard at our boy scout skills. That climb was more like 40-50 feet than 30.
PS: Tom, since I did climb out, would it not be as pretentious if I wanted to rename it?
Kuenn
Your former scoutmaster would be proud – looks like a square and a shear – those lashing relay events finally paid off!
Lots of rope on the latter… “think you used enough dynamite there, Butch?”
ratagonia
Thanks for poking your head in, TPax. We are all somewhat confused as to how the exit spot could get so jammed up as to be undiscoverable… but it was. In “normal conditions” it is as Bootboy describes, but you apparently found it after a flood or rockfall or something. No/Yes, in that first picture, the exit is to the left, not far in front of the camera person, about 10 feet toward the camera from where you entered the cross-joint.
Since the climb had previously been done, you do NOT get to rename it. Did you also start a fire, letting the flickering flames light your journey upward? Love the lash-braced cross long to stabilize your aid-climbing device. Very clever!
Tom
Ram
What a fun thread, with the Devil’s Hole/Pit back in the news. If i recall, it was called the Hole by Royce? And those that wrote the second report, “in search of” called it a Pit? No matter. To be fair, Royce implies a first descent, yet….he was rapping off bolts down the big wall? Naturally occurring bolts? Or can we give credit where credit is due to Bogart and Turville? Thought so!
Back when i was reading the stories in the black book, totally terrified by the idea of the place, we guessed that there was a wall that stopped these folks and guessed at a natural bridge, underwater as a possible explanation. As it turns out, it is just a spot, low in the canyon but before it opens up a bit, that is a narrow doorway. A large log, that we would walk across, some 10 feet up was kind of the structural base and that floods would bring debris and logs into the narrow doorway, obscuring the down canyon passage entirely. If one thinks of those narrow openings in Pandora’s Box that show periodically in that canyon and imagine a a lot of debris landing against those openings, one can appreciate how the right way can become totally obscured. It is immediately after a side canyon that comes in on the left, LDC.
Reading those black book accounts in the 80’s, into the early 90’s was a big part of our groups lore. Fantastical accounts by bold adventurers, we revered and were in awe of. here is an account of how it felt to us.
http://www.math.utah.edu/~sfolias/canyontales/ram/?i=heaps
Most two week Zion trips would invariably have a rainy day or two. We would wake, in the morning, take inventory of the weather and roll over and back to sleep. When we finally arose, we would tossed around the possibilities for the day. We would propose several options for the afternoon, guessing and hoping for that PM clearing. In the mean time, breakfast in town would be followed by a trip to the Visitor Center. I would go up to the backcountry desk and ask the person manning the station, for the Black Book. He/she would give me one of the two black books containing topos of many of the parks technical climbing routes. I would say “No, no, not those” and ask for the 3rd black book, the one with the backcountry routes. This loose leaf binder had many trip reports and route descriptions, some quite old, all very interesting. Reading the book, I found many routes that have become quite popular today, but were rarely done back then. Behunin, The Right Fork, Mt. of the Sun and Mystery Canyon were just a few of these.
My favorite reason for reading the book was to lose myself in the story of the first recorded descent (according to this report, anyway) of Heaps Canyon and the follow up descent. They were titled “The Devil’s Pit” and “In Search of the Devil’s Pit,” respectively. Throughout the 1980s, I would direct uninitiated partners, to a ‘sit down’ journey through these stories. At the time, we were—as a group—very far from the skill set necessary to tackle such a challenging canyon, or so the stories led us to believe. We were thoroughly entertained by the tale of tenuous log jams, frigid 300–yard swims, death trap potholes and dizzying 300–foot rappels, but scariest of all was ‘the Devil’s Pit.’
It was implied, in the story, that the canyon just ended against a blank wall. Seemed impossible and so we speculated about underwater passages and all fashion of unlikely explanations. The original descent team arrived at the Pit in fading light. They found themselves swimming, unable to retreat to dry ground and near panic. A small side canyon offered a possible escape. They set off to climb it, packs tethered by sling. Unable to see enough to negotiate the climb, they emptied their white gas container on a floating driftwood pile and lit it aflame. They then climbed the pitch by fire light, up to a ledge and a cold, wet bivouac. The next day up on top, they went looking for an escape route home. They only were able to go 20 minutes before a side canyon, draining into Heaps proper, forced them, cold and discouraged, to rap back into the wet and grueling wonderland. They negotiated the lower canyon and the big drops at the canyons end, wrote the tale, and headed home. It captured the imagination of the 2nd descenders and they went in search of the Devil’s Pit. They did not find it and had a relatively problem–free descent.
Where had it gone … this Devil’s Pit?
Friend after friend would read the tale and shake their head in amazement at the ‘hard men’ lighting fires and climbing by them, in desperation. We attached a mythical reverence to the pioneers and to the place. I was comfortable with the fact that experiencing this magical place was not in the cards for me and my pals. I was never going to be skilled enough to go there. It felt OK to have such a place to worship, where us mortals fear to tread.
hank moon
This just in: a friend heard from a ranger at the BC desk that the 30 ft. obstacle was a log jam. Unverified, of course…
gajslk
The other issue is that canyons change. Heaps and Imlay are romps with high water levels. Low water? A new log jam? Maybe not so much. But your buddy, not as good as you, went through last year and reported them as over rated….
Gordon
hank moon
Welcome Driftwood – may your Zion dreams be (safely) realized ASAP!
I don’t think we will see any permit restrictions based on skills/competency. No good way to manage that. If only the canyons were underwater….
Bootboy
Or at the top of a very scary grade IV alpine climb, after a 2 day backpack in…
Imagine the exclusivity!
That’s the tricky things with canyons though, the skills required to get yourself into some of these places are pretty minimal, While the skills required to get past the crux, let alone self rescue can be much greater. Any fool can rappel into a heap (no pun intended) of trouble with the ability to go neither forward, nor backwards.
Others activities, climbing in particular, are self-limiting in that regard. Generally speaking, the trouble you can get yourself into is more directly correlated to your ability. It’s easier to turn around once you’re in over your head. I’m speaking very generally here, but I think the principle is true.
That’s the curse of this activity (I don’t think of it as a sport) we call canyoneering.
driftwood
So, as a newbie canyoneer who lives a long way from Zion, when I go to Zion I will do Heaps, Imlay and Kolob*. Sometimes, based on reading about these places, I wonder if that is really a good idea. My partner I’d be going with is very experienced and assures me we’ll go right through them all alpine style. And if we don’t, a true bivouac is no problem.
Any sort of permit restrictions for those canyons that require having completed any other canyons seems excessively restrictive and would be extremely disappointing to me. If they told me I have to do Pine Creek first I’d probably just go do Poe instead. With limited time and resources I want the most bang for my buck. And as an experienced outdoorsman and adventurer who thinks “the harder the better” I’d be going for the big ones.
Reading this article makes me want to go even more.
* I realize Kolob might not be possible due to the permit issues. Heaps and Imlay for sure.
AW~
True….although humourous. Thats the purpose of this group…to expose the conspiracy!
ratagonia
Or the statement in the report could be not entirely accurate.
ratagonia
“From our position as we climbed the canyon walls, we could no longer see the actual fire, but as it gained new material for its flames, a muted kaleidoscope of light and colors played upon the rugged walls. While we were in no real danger, I felt compelled to watch, almost hypnotized like the small victim of some steadily advancing serpent. It was awesomely beautiful, yet like unto an inferno deep within the earth. A Devil’s Hole! We both ended up sleeping between opposing walls that were not as wide as our shoulders, my head on Norm’s feet, my feet over the edge. A very long night.”
Royce called it A Devil’s Hole. Kinda pretentious for a guy to re-name it, especially a guy that did not even climb three-pitches to bypass it.
Tom
K Marshall
Hank,
I don’t know. If additional debris is found at this location, I believe it could be mistaken for a pit by the canyon-naive. The section of Heaps that I’m thinking goes “The Iron Room”, “The Grim Swim”, “The Green Room”, “The (boltless) Plunge”, and then “The Devil’s Pit”. It’s at tight four-way fracture into a pool and the log hides the exit. If you miss the exit, you end up walking out the pool into a slight uphill sandy slope. I believe there is a way to escape to the rim if you continue. Just a thought.
Kip
hank moon
yah, i dunno either. guess we’ll have to find out from the group itself, if an opportunity presents. i changed the text you quoted…
SCard
Are there any photos of this “Devil’s Hole” out there. I kinda want to see this beast. I know the dead-end spot that Hank is speaking of. It threw me my first time there, but this Devils Hole is new to me.