For the Kong duck and Ropeman – do we know if they damage the rope much, if at all? I mean, if there was a need for a party to retreat, several persons would sequentially need to ascend the same rope, and if each pass with the ascender damaged the rope one might worry about it. Its probably only an issue if subsequent pases happend to cinch on the exact same spot as a prior ascendee.
Yahoo Canyons Group
Tom Jones
Actually I meant “new” as in brand-new, not-yet-broken-in. The BW rope is quite small and slick before it gets broken in, and getting the tibloc to stick to it is challenging.
Tom
— In Yahoo Canyons Group, “rich_rudow” wrote:
Hey Tom, by ‘new canyon pro’ do you mean the 8mm DS and Xtreme ropes > that have the Technora sheath? I’ve been using one Petzl handle > ascender and one Tibloc w/Attache on 8mm Canyon Pro lately with with > fine success. I just bought a new 8mm BW Canyon Pro Xtreme rope to > try out but have not turned the Tibloc lose on it yet. Bad idea?
Regards,
Rich
> — In Yahoo Canyons Group, “Tom Jones” wrote:
Same priciples apply.
The small ascending tool most known for tearing up ropes is the
Petzl Tibloc. I have used it a lot on small ropes in the last
couple of years. It will work on 8mm ropes consistently, even
Canyon Pro (which tends to be a little small), if used with care.
New Canyon Pro – very difficult – requires careful setting of the
Tibloc on the rope with each placement. Tibloc on 8mm static rope
requires a FAT ROUND carabiner like the Petzl Attache to work.
But, static ropes are firmer than dynamic climbing ropes, and I
could see it being very difficult to set consistently on 8mm
climbing ropes.
When the Tibloc “fails”, it slides down the rope with the teeth
tearing up the sheath. I have not had big problems with this, but
others have.
ANY small ascending tool can damage the sheath (some) if it slips
when weighted. But, most of them will make only very tiny damage,
at body weight. The spring on the Ropeman will wear out, and I
found it necessary to squeeze it onto the rope when weighting it,
for the last few months I used it.
The Duck looks cool.
At body weight, ascenders, large or small, do not damage the rope,
unless your try quite hard to do so. I believe BDC has torn up a
rope with a tibloc, while hauling a pack and having misfortune.
Tom
— In Yahoo Canyons Group, “kiwi_outdoors” wrote:
Jeff – don’t cavers use a heavier rope, whereas in canyoneering
the
> trend is to 9 mm? If so, it might not be the best analogy.
— In Yahoo Canyons Group, jef levin wrote:
kiwi_outdoors@ kiwi_outdoors wrote:
>For the Kong duck and Ropeman – do we know if they damage the
rope
>much, if at all? I mean, if there was a need for a party to
> retreat,
>several persons would sequentially need to ascend the same
rope,
> and if
>each pass with the ascender damaged the rope one might worry
about
> it.
>Its probably only an issue if subsequent pases happend to > cinch
on
> the
>exact same spot as a prior ascendee.
Other than very slight minor abrasion of the sheath from
repeated
> use (which also happens from any kind of use and is not an issue)
> ascenders damaging the rope is not a concern, at least under
normal
> body weight loads. I wouldn’t worry about it no matter how many
> people ascended the same rope (as is routinely done in caving)
– Jef
rich_rudow
Hey Tom, by ‘new canyon pro’ do you mean the 8mm DS and Xtreme ropes that have the Technora sheath? I’ve been using one Petzl handle ascender and one Tibloc w/Attache on 8mm Canyon Pro lately with with fine success. I just bought a new 8mm BW Canyon Pro Xtreme rope to try out but have not turned the Tibloc lose on it yet. Bad idea?
Regards,
Rich
— In Yahoo Canyons Group, “Tom Jones” wrote:
Same priciples apply.
The small ascending tool most known for tearing up ropes is the > Petzl Tibloc. I have used it a lot on small ropes in the last > couple of years. It will work on 8mm ropes consistently, even > Canyon Pro (which tends to be a little small), if used with care. > New Canyon Pro – very difficult – requires careful setting of the > Tibloc on the rope with each placement. Tibloc on 8mm static rope > requires a FAT ROUND carabiner like the Petzl Attache to work.
But, static ropes are firmer than dynamic climbing ropes, and I > could see it being very difficult to set consistently on 8mm > climbing ropes.
When the Tibloc “fails”, it slides down the rope with the teeth > tearing up the sheath. I have not had big problems with this, but > others have.
ANY small ascending tool can damage the sheath (some) if it slips > when weighted. But, most of them will make only very tiny damage, > at body weight. The spring on the Ropeman will wear out, and I > found it necessary to squeeze it onto the rope when weighting it, > for the last few months I used it.
The Duck looks cool.
At body weight, ascenders, large or small, do not damage the rope, > unless your try quite hard to do so. I believe BDC has torn up a > rope with a tibloc, while hauling a pack and having misfortune.
Tom
> — In Yahoo Canyons Group, “kiwi_outdoors” – Jef
Tom Jones
Same priciples apply.
The small ascending tool most known for tearing up ropes is the Petzl Tibloc. I have used it a lot on small ropes in the last couple of years. It will work on 8mm ropes consistently, even Canyon Pro (which tends to be a little small), if used with care. New Canyon Pro – very difficult – requires careful setting of the Tibloc on the rope with each placement. Tibloc on 8mm static rope requires a FAT ROUND carabiner like the Petzl Attache to work.
But, static ropes are firmer than dynamic climbing ropes, and I could see it being very difficult to set consistently on 8mm climbing ropes.
When the Tibloc “fails”, it slides down the rope with the teeth tearing up the sheath. I have not had big problems with this, but others have.
ANY small ascending tool can damage the sheath (some) if it slips when weighted. But, most of them will make only very tiny damage, at body weight. The spring on the Ropeman will wear out, and I found it necessary to squeeze it onto the rope when weighting it, for the last few months I used it.
The Duck looks cool.
At body weight, ascenders, large or small, do not damage the rope, unless your try quite hard to do so. I believe BDC has torn up a rope with a tibloc, while hauling a pack and having misfortune.
Tom
— In Yahoo Canyons Group, “kiwi_outdoors” wrote:
Jeff – don’t cavers use a heavier rope, whereas in canyoneering the > trend is to 9 mm? If so, it might not be the best analogy.
— In Yahoo Canyons Group, jef levin wrote:
kiwi_outdoors@ kiwi_outdoors wrote:
>For the Kong duck and Ropeman – do we know if they damage the rope
>much, if at all? I mean, if there was a need for a party to > retreat,
>several persons would sequentially need to ascend the same rope, > and if
>each pass with the ascender damaged the rope one might worry about > it.
>Its probably only an issue if subsequent pases happend to cinch on > the
>exact same spot as a prior ascendee.
Other than very slight minor abrasion of the sheath from repeated > use (which also happens from any kind of use and is not an issue) > ascenders damaging the rope is not a concern, at least under normal > body weight loads. I wouldn’t worry about it no matter how many > people ascended the same rope (as is routinely done in caving)
– Jef
>
kiwi_outdoors
Jeff – don’t cavers use a heavier rope, whereas in canyoneering the trend is to 9 mm? If so, it might not be the best analogy.
— In Yahoo Canyons Group, jef levin wrote:
kiwi_outdoors@… kiwi_outdoors wrote:
>For the Kong duck and Ropeman – do we know if they damage the rope
much, if at all? I mean, if there was a need for a party to retreat,
several persons would sequentially need to ascend the same rope, and if
each pass with the ascender damaged the rope one might worry about it.
Its probably only an issue if subsequent pases happend to cinch on the
exact same spot as a prior ascendee.
Other than very slight minor abrasion of the sheath from repeated use (which also happens from any kind of use and is not an issue) ascenders damaging the rope is not a concern, at least under normal body weight loads. I wouldn’t worry about it no matter how many people ascended the same rope (as is routinely done in caving) > – Jef >
jef levin
kiwi_outdoors@yahoo.com kiwi_outdoors wrote:
>For the Kong duck and Ropeman – do we know if they damage the rope >much, if at all? I mean, if there was a need for a party to retreat, >several persons would sequentially need to ascend the same rope, and if >each pass with the ascender damaged the rope one might worry about it. >Its probably only an issue if subsequent pases happend to cinch on the >exact same spot as a prior ascendee.
Other than very slight minor abrasion of the sheath from repeated use (which also happens from any kind of use and is not an issue) ascenders damaging the rope is not a concern, at least under normal body weight loads. I wouldn’t worry about it no matter how many people ascended the same rope (as is routinely done in caving) – Jef