Here’s a New York Times article that may be of interest to many in the group. There’s talk about Arches/Canyonlands/The Swell, cryptobiotic soil, and the placement of oil rigs. Gonna take more than epoxy and sand to patch these drill holes.
February 8, 2002
Bush Administration Allows Oil Drilling Near Utah Parks
By TIMOTHY EGAN
MOAB, Utah, Feb. 5 – The Bush administration is opening the red rock country near two of Utah’s popular national parks to oil and gas drilling, over the objections of some park rangers in the Southwest and government scientists.
As part of the president’s energy plan to expand development on federal lands, 50,000-pound trucks have been pounding the ground between Arches and Canyonlands National Parks, searching for oil with seismic measuring instruments. At the same time, oil companies have bought leases to drill on federal land outside Canyonlands park.
Administration officials say visitors to the parks will barely notice the changes to the land, while national park scientists say the land could take decades to recover from the shock waves of the industrial hammerings.
Oil derricks and drilling equipment have long been a feature on the nation’s public lands, with nearly 35 million acres open to development. During the Clinton years, oil and gas leasing increased considerably over previous administrations. But areas considered wilderness and areas near national parks were usually off- limits.
The Bush administration has been pushing federal land managers to speed up development, which includes work within two miles of national parks, as is happening here. Federal land managers who control the scenic Utah lands have been told that energy development is now the top concern.
“Utah needs to ensure that existing staff understand that when an oil and gas lease parcel or when an application for permission to drill comes in the door, that this work is their No.1 priority,” Bureau of Land Management supervisors wrote to field officers in a memorandum a month ago.
This week, as President Bush unveiled his budget, Interior Secretary Gale A. Norton requested new financing to streamline permits and study sites to drill on federal lands. Ms. Norton said the new exploration could be done with minimal environmental damage.
But national park officials say they are alarmed as the exploration trucks and drilling equipment have come close to their borders. The parks around this town, a mountain- biking mecca on the Colorado River, had huge increases in visitors over the last decade.
To protect the sandstone spires and the living surface layer that covers the red rocks of Utah’s canyon country, the Bureau of Land Management has repeatedly urged mountain bikers and off-road vehicle users to tread lightly and stay on the main roads. At the same time, the bureau, the nation’s biggest land manager, has given the go-ahead for trucks to crisscross thousands of acres of roadless desert soil, looking for oil.
Park officials said that drilling equipment near Canyonlands National Park will mar the view, and that the tracks from exploration trucks could lead to new off-road vehicle use in areas where officials are trying to limit intrusion. Federal scientists expressed similar concerns about exploratory ventures set to begin this month outside Arches National Park, site of the signature Delicate Arch that adorns Utah license plates.
“Our concern is with visibility issues and road construction,” said Bruce Rodgers, the chief of resource management at Canyonlands National Park. “You would be able to see these roads, platforms and pumps from the park. And the soil is quite fragile.”
The Bush administration is also preparing to sell new leases next month around the San Rafael Swell, a curtain of rainbow-colored cliffs which Gov. Michael O. Leavitt, a Republican, has proposed setting aside as a national monument.
Officials with the Bureau of Land Management, which controls one- eighth of all the land in the United States and 22 million acres in Utah alone, said that the oil development would be done in such a way to minimize what recreational users see on the land and that the oil companies would have to restore the land near the parks when the work was completed.
“You won’t see it looking like West Texas with oil pumps everywhere,” said Bill Stringer, the deputy field manager of the bureau office here. “The drilling will be spread out, and in some cases we’ll get them to turn the drills sideways so you can barely see them from the parks.”
The door to new drilling and exploration on public lands has opened just as the price of energy and natural gas has plummeted. When the president issued his energy plan a year ago, with increasing drilling on public lands in the West and in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge as a centerpiece, gas and oil prices were high. They are now at a level that gives some companies little incentive to proceed beyond exploration.
“Last year everybody was geared up for a boom,” said Neil Stanley, a vice president of Forest Oil, which has numerous oil-drilling leases on public land in the West. “The old bumper sticker slogan – `Lord, please give me one last boom and I won’t let it get away’ – that’s how people felt. But now, the prices are causing me to wonder what I’m doing.”
Officials at another oil company expressed surprise that the Bush administration was selling leases in scenic areas so close to Canyonlands National Park.
“We’re all just sort of shaking our head because this area is so controversial,” said Beth McBride, president of Legacy Oil, which owns a lease that allows it to drill for oil in the Lockhart Basin next to Canyonlands National Park. The area, which had been considered for wilderness protection and part of an expanded national park, is habitat for bighorn sheep and other rare species. Scientists say the animals depend on the delicate soil for nutrients and water that comes from springs on that land.
“Although the Clinton administration certainly wasn’t shy about issuing leases, they were much more careful to avoid scenic and unique landscapes like southern Utah’s,” said Heidi McIntosh of the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, an environmental group based in Salt Lake City.
Two months ago, environmental groups sued the federal government for its lease sales near Arches National Park and nearly a dozen other areas in the Rocky Mountain West.
Ms. McBride, whose company owns a lease to drill in the contested area outside Canyonlands, agreed with parts of the lawsuit.
“I’m kind of with them,” Ms. McBride said in an interview. “They shouldn’t tell us we can come in and drill if they haven’t cleared up all the environmental issues.”
The park staff at Dead Horse Point State Park, a popular site between Canyonlands National Park and Arches, urged the government to deny a permit for oil companies to do seismic exploration in the area. These exploratory probes are part of decades-old search for oil throughout the interior West. The region is rich in natural gas, and there are oil deposits of uncertain size.
A United States Geological Survey expert on soil damage, Dr. Jayne Belnap, wrote bureau officials last year, warning of long-term damage from new exploration near Canyonlands National Park. It could take up to 250 years for some of the dry soil around the park to recover from the heavy exploration equipment, Dr. Belnap wrote in a memorandum.
thetashifter
— In canyons@y…, llana kanka wrote:
Thanks for sharing the article. Intersting and scary stuff. > The new direction is sort of inevitable, what with the energy crises we’ve had the last couple of years, and with the changes in Washington. But in all fairness…I think blaming Bush is a little too convenient.
Just to clarify, all references to who is responsible are the opinions of the NYT writer and editors, not neccesarily my own. I’m not trying to start a political campaign here, just wanted to point out the article. But I will acknowledge that the article has a certain slant to it… heck it’s almost an Op/Ed piece.
> It doesn’t matter who is in office or which party is in control. > We’re not SUWA or the Sierra Club. And the e-group probably isn’t the right place to discuss it. But I think those of us who love this area should be aware of what’s going on, so thanks very much for sharing the article with us. >
Yep, exactly! I posted the article because this may impact us as canyoneers (not democrats or republicans). I doubt many in this group like the idea of oil development near the canyons we work so hard to minimize our impact on, no matter what political orientation they may hold. Thanks for the reply.
—>Bob Hayes
llana kanka
Thanks for sharing the article. Intersting and scary stuff. The new direction is sort of inevitable, what with the energy crises we’ve had the last couple of years, and with the changes in Washington. But in all fairness…I think blaming Bush is a little too convenient. The seismic work and the wells in the Joes Valley area (adjacent to the Swell) went in during the Clinton administration. I worked a full summer for a seismic company (WG) that tortured the Hole-in-the-Wall land near Kaycee, Wyoming during the Carter administration. Pretty damned shameful what we did there. If you’re a blind paid-off land owner or a college kid lucky enough to get a good paying seismic job, yeah maybe you wouldn’t even notice the damage. When I moved to Blanding (way before the last presidential election) I was horrified to find WG there. They were doing seismic work in the Cedar Mesa and Canyonlands-adjacent areas, and when I’ve been out in the canyons I have seen the evidence. It doesn’t matter who is in office or which party is in control. We’re not SUWA or the Sierra Club. And the e-group probably isn’t the right place to discuss it. But I think those of us who love this area should be aware of what’s going on, so thanks very much for sharing the article with us.
Send FREE Valentine eCards with Greetings!
Charly Oliver
I believe SUWA has additional information about this on their web site.
Charly —–Original Message—– From: thetashifter [mailto:thetashift@stopstabbingme.com] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 9:36 AM To: Yahoo Canyons Group Subject: [from Canyons Group] New York Times article on CP oil development
Here’s a New York Times article that may be of interest to many in the group. There’s talk about Arches/Canyonlands/The Swell, cryptobiotic soil, and the placement of oil rigs. Gonna take more than epoxy and sand to patch these drill holes.
February 8, 2002
Bush Administration Allows Oil Drilling Near Utah Parks
By TIMOTHY EGAN
MOAB, Utah, Feb. 5 – The Bush administration is opening the red rock country near two of Utah’s popular national parks to oil and gas drilling, over the objections of some park rangers in the Southwest and government scientists.
As part of the president’s energy plan to expand development on federal lands, 50,000-pound trucks have been pounding the ground between Arches and Canyonlands National Parks, searching for oil with seismic measuring instruments. At the same time, oil companies have bought leases to drill on federal land outside Canyonlands park.
Administration officials say visitors to the parks will barely notice the changes to the land, while national park scientists say the land could take decades to recover from the shock waves of the industrial hammerings.
Oil derricks and drilling equipment have long been a feature on the nation’s public lands, with nearly 35 million acres open to development. During the Clinton years, oil and gas leasing increased considerably over previous administrations. But areas considered wilderness and areas near national parks were usually off- limits.
The Bush administration has been pushing federal land managers to speed up development, which includes work within two miles of national parks, as is happening here. Federal land managers who control the scenic Utah lands have been told that energy development is now the top concern.
“Utah needs to ensure that existing staff understand that when an oil and gas lease parcel or when an application for permission to drill comes in the door, that this work is their No.1 priority,” Bureau of Land Management supervisors wrote to field officers in a memorandum a month ago.
This week, as President Bush unveiled his budget, Interior Secretary Gale A. Norton requested new financing to streamline permits and study sites to drill on federal lands. Ms. Norton said the new exploration could be done with minimal environmental damage.
But national park officials say they are alarmed as the exploration trucks and drilling equipment have come close to their borders. The parks around this town, a mountain- biking mecca on the Colorado River, had huge increases in visitors over the last decade.
To protect the sandstone spires and the living surface layer that covers the red rocks of Utah’s canyon country, the Bureau of Land Management has repeatedly urged mountain bikers and off-road vehicle users to tread lightly and stay on the main roads. At the same time, the bureau, the nation’s biggest land manager, has given the go-ahead for trucks to crisscross thousands of acres of roadless desert soil, looking for oil.
Park officials said that drilling equipment near Canyonlands National Park will mar the view, and that the tracks from exploration trucks could lead to new off-road vehicle use in areas where officials are trying to limit intrusion. Federal scientists expressed similar concerns about exploratory ventures set to begin this month outside Arches National Park, site of the signature Delicate Arch that adorns Utah license plates.
“Our concern is with visibility issues and road construction,” said Bruce Rodgers, the chief of resource management at Canyonlands National Park. “You would be able to see these roads, platforms and pumps from the park. And the soil is quite fragile.”
The Bush administration is also preparing to sell new leases next month around the San Rafael Swell, a curtain of rainbow-colored cliffs which Gov. Michael O. Leavitt, a Republican, has proposed setting aside as a national monument.
Officials with the Bureau of Land Management, which controls one- eighth of all the land in the United States and 22 million acres in Utah alone, said that the oil development would be done in such a way to minimize what recreational users see on the land and that the oil companies would have to restore the land near the parks when the work was completed.
“You won’t see it looking like West Texas with oil pumps everywhere,” said Bill Stringer, the deputy field manager of the bureau office here. “The drilling will be spread out, and in some cases we’ll get them to turn the drills sideways so you can barely see them from the parks.”
The door to new drilling and exploration on public lands has opened just as the price of energy and natural gas has plummeted. When the president issued his energy plan a year ago, with increasing drilling on public lands in the West and in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge as a centerpiece, gas and oil prices were high. They are now at a level that gives some companies little incentive to proceed beyond exploration.
“Last year everybody was geared up for a boom,” said Neil Stanley, a vice president of Forest Oil, which has numerous oil-drilling leases on public land in the West. “The old bumper sticker slogan – `Lord, please give me one last boom and I won’t let it get away’ – that’s how people felt. But now, the prices are causing me to wonder what I’m doing.”
Officials at another oil company expressed surprise that the Bush administration was selling leases in scenic areas so close to Canyonlands National Park.
“We’re all just sort of shaking our head because this area is so controversial,” said Beth McBride, president of Legacy Oil, which owns a lease that allows it to drill for oil in the Lockhart Basin next to Canyonlands National Park. The area, which had been considered for wilderness protection and part of an expanded national park, is habitat for bighorn sheep and other rare species. Scientists say the animals depend on the delicate soil for nutrients and water that comes from springs on that land.
“Although the Clinton administration certainly wasn’t shy about issuing leases, they were much more careful to avoid scenic and unique landscapes like southern Utah’s,” said Heidi McIntosh of the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, an environmental group based in Salt Lake City.
Two months ago, environmental groups sued the federal government for its lease sales near Arches National Park and nearly a dozen other areas in the Rocky Mountain West.
Ms. McBride, whose company owns a lease to drill in the contested area outside Canyonlands, agreed with parts of the lawsuit.
“I’m kind of with them,” Ms. McBride said in an interview. “They shouldn’t tell us we can come in and drill if they haven’t cleared up all the environmental issues.”
The park staff at Dead Horse Point State Park, a popular site between Canyonlands National Park and Arches, urged the government to deny a permit for oil companies to do seismic exploration in the area. These exploratory probes are part of decades-old search for oil throughout the interior West. The region is rich in natural gas, and there are oil deposits of uncertain size.
A United States Geological Survey expert on soil damage, Dr. Jayne Belnap, wrote bureau officials last year, warning of long-term damage from new exploration near Canyonlands National Park. It could take up to 250 years for some of the dry soil around the park to recover from the heavy exploration equipment, Dr. Belnap wrote in a memorandum.
Groups Sponsor ADVERTISEMENT
To change your options, go to the Canyons Egroup page on yahoo: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/canyons/
This will require logging into Yahoo. Click on the “Edit My Membership” link, and change your delivery option. Press “Save Changes”.
DAILY DIGEST OPTION will deliver one email to you each day summarizing that day’s messages.
WEB ONLY OPTION will not deliver email; you must visit the web site to view messages.
Your use of Groups is subject to the Terms of Service.