This was a fascinating read. Biological solutions always seem to have unintended consequences. Someone here (POFR?) mentioned that native species have had trouble reestablishing after the Tammies are gone. Time will tell. Tammies were and are a big problem. lets hope bigger concerns don’t replace them
Grand Canyon National Park News Release Release date: Immediate
Contact(s): Maureen Oltrogge Phone number: 928-638-7779 Date: October 21, 2009
Tamarisk Beetle (Diorhabda spp.) found along Colorado River within Grand Canyon National Park
Grand Canyon, Ariz. —Biologists and ecologists from the National Park
Service and the Tamarisk Coalition, based in Grand Junction, Colorado,
recently found the first tamarisk leaf beetle (Diorhabda spp.) in Grand
Canyon National Park. The tamarisk leaf beetle, which feeds specifically
on tamarisk, was approved for release as a biological control agent in
certain areas of the west in 2001 to help manage tamarisk. Also known as
salt cedar, tamarisk (Tamarix spp.) is a highly invasive plant native to
Eurasia that grows along the Colorado River and in riparian habitats
throughout the southwest. Tamarisk, which is particularly successful in
areas with altered flow regimes, impacts water resources, native plant
diversity, wildlife habitat, and recreation, and poses an increased
wildfire risk where it grows in dense stands.
The National Park Service and numerous partners began a tamarisk management
program in Grand Canyon National Park in 2000. The effort focuses on the
park’s side canyons and tributaries, where a natural flow regime occurs.
To date, approximately 270,000 trees have been removed from over 6,000
acres in the park. Park biologists and volunteers continue to maintain
those areas, and have documented the important recovery of native
vegetation. Lori Makarick, the park’s Vegetation Program Manager, stated,
“We plan on continuing this program, and in fact, have people removing
tamarisk from the park’s backcountry this week.†She added, “Now that the
tamarisk beetle has been found in the park, we also need to make sure we
are prepared to move forward with active native plant restoration efforts
in the Colorado River Corridor in the next few years.â€Â
Tamarisk beetle monitoring along the Colorado River in Grand Canyon
National Park was conducted from August 9-24. During monitoring, small
numbers of beetle larvae were found on tamarisk trees along both sides of
the river corridor beneath Navajo Bridge and on river left at Brown’s
Inscription, twelve miles downstream of Lees Ferry. National Park Service
biologists found adult beetles six miles downstream of Lees Ferry in
September.
Researchers previously thought that this species of the tamarisk leaf
beetle would restrict its range to above the 38th parallel, which is near
the upper end of Lake Powell. The beetles were not approved for release
within 200 miles of southwestern willow flycatcher habitat, an endangered
species which is known to nest in tamarisk – a dominant species in the
Colorado River corridor. Tamarisk leaf beetles are now causing defoliation
of tamarisk trees further south than originally anticipated. According to
Dr. Dan Bean of the Colorado Department of Agriculture, the small
population of beetles recently documented in Grand Canyon National Park is
unlikely to overwinter successfully. However, it appears likely that as
beetle numbers increase a viable reproducing population will be established
in Grand Canyon within the next several years.
The Tamarisk Coalition, whose mission is to provide education and technical
assistance for the restoration of riparian lands in the west, and the
Colorado Department of Agriculture are collaboratively monitoring the
tamarisk beetle in Colorado, Utah and Arizona. They are tracking its
dispersal, establishment, and expansion and providing information on
impacts of the beetle on riparian native and non-native plant ecology and
wildlife habitat. Tim Carlson, Tamarisk Coalition Research and Policy
Director, notes, “Monitoring of beetle movement and vegetative response are
critically important, not only to understand the direct and indirect
impacts of the beetle on riparian ecosystems, but in order to implement
adaptive management activities aimed at re-establishing native vegetation.â€Â
According to Lori Makarick, this will become increasingly important in
areas along the Colorado River corridor that provide critical habitat for
threatened and endangered species.
The continued spread of the tamarisk leaf beetle throughout the Colorado
River in Grand Canyon National Park may have dramatic impacts on the
canyon’s complex riparian ecosystems. Growing infestations of the tamarisk
leaf beetle in Grand Canyon may defoliate and kill tamarisk trees that now
dominate the river corridor. While the demise of this nonnative invader is
welcome, it will pose new management challenges such as: how to remove the
standing dead trees, how to assess rapid changes in wildlife habitat, and
how to successfully restore native plant communities. Park resource
managers are eager to expand and develop new partnerships with other
federal land management agencies and organizations to assist with the
development of long-term plans to restore native ecosystems in the Colorado
River corridor both within and outside park boundaries. Plans will need to
address potential impacts to species of special concern, such as the
southwestern willow flycatcher and the wide array of insects and wildlife
that currently utilize tamarisk. The initiation of the tamarisk beetle
monitoring effort was the first step in a pro-active approach that will
include coordination among stakeholders involved in planning and
implementing riparian restoration projects.
Martha Hahn, Chief of Science and Resource Management, stated, “This is a
situation where there are no boundaries and we will need to work with all
land management agencies within the greater Colorado River watershed that
wildlife habitat and sensitive species planning is integrated into all of
our planning efforts and decisions.
Superintendent Steve Martin said, “Park resource management staff, as well
as staff from other federal land management agencies and partner
organizations has been very successful in controlling tamarisk in the
park’s side canyons. With continued coordination and stakeholder
involvement, we should be successful in actively restoring native plant
communities and wildlife habitat in the river corridor.â€Â
For additional information, please contact Lori Makarick, Vegetation
Program Manager at Grand Canyon National Park at (928) 226-0165 or Tim
Carlson, Research and Policy Director at the Tamarisk Coalition (970)
256-7400 www.tamariskcoalition.org.
-NPS-
Maureen Oltrogge Public Affairs Officer Grand Canyon National Park (928) 638-7779 (928) 638-7609 fax maureen_oltrogge@…
j b
To be fair, many “solutions” have unintended consequences. In fact, when you’re talking restoration ecology, there often aren’t really solutions so much as arrays of alternatives, each associated with different costs. Don’t remember what I might have said, but as the article hints, simply nuking weeds doesn’t have a lasting effect–you have to replace them with something better, which is the Hard Part.
And if Brazil is any indication, in 50 years we won’t have to worry much about killer bees . . . I understand that many Brazilians think they’re great, because they are apparently getting less aggressive and produce significantly more honey.
Jeff
________________________________ From: rich_rudow rich_rudow@trimble.com> To: Yahoo Canyons Group Sent: Thu, October 22, 2009 12:48:42 PM Subject: [from Canyons Group] Re: Tamarisk Beetle found along Colorado River within Grand Canyon
The unintended consequences of this kind of action can be scary. Kind of like the killer bee escaping captivity in Brazil in the 50’s….only to sting canyoneers in Arizona 50 years later! But … damn those tammies are a pest. Hiking along the river today in Grand Canyon requires a machete … or a pack raft to escape the carnage
Rich
— In Yahoo Canyons Group, “todds_hiking_guide” wrote:
Wouldn’t surprise me if they soon develop a taste for California Condor eggs.
-Todd
— In Yahoo Canyons Group, “RAM” wrote:
This was a fascinating read. Biological solutions always seem to have unintended consequences. Someone here (POFR?) mentioned that native species have had trouble reestablishing after the Tammies are gone. Time will tell. Tammies were and are a big problem. lets hope bigger concerns don’t replace them
Grand Canyon National Park News Release
Release date: Immediate
>
—
When you post, please change the Subject appropriately, to make reading and searching easier. You can use the following abbreviations: TRIP = Trip Report; BETA = Canyon Beta; PARTNER = Partner and/or Rides; ETHICS = Ethics; TECH = Technical Questions and Tips; BIZ = E Group Business; SALE = Stuff for Sale. Please use a Tilde ~ after the abbreviation, so we know you are coding for us, such as:
Subject: BIZ~ New Abbreviation List – working?
To change your delivery options, go to the Canyons Egroup page on yahoo: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/canyons/
This will require logging into Yahoo. Click on the "Edit My Membership" link, and change your delivery option. Press "Save Changes".
WEB ONLY OPTION will not deliver email; you must visit the web site to view messages. Groups Links
rich_rudow
The unintended consequences of this kind of action can be scary. Kind of like the killer bee escaping captivity in Brazil in the 50’s….only to sting canyoneers in Arizona 50 years later! But … damn those tammies are a pest. Hiking along the river today in Grand Canyon requires a machete … or a pack raft to escape the carnage
Rich
— In Yahoo Canyons Group, “todds_hiking_guide” wrote:
Wouldn’t surprise me if they soon develop a taste for California Condor eggs.
-Todd
— In Yahoo Canyons Group, “RAM” wrote:
This was a fascinating read. Biological solutions always seem to have unintended consequences. Someone here (POFR?) mentioned that native species have had trouble reestablishing after the Tammies are gone. Time will tell. Tammies were and are a big problem. lets hope bigger concerns don’t replace them
Grand Canyon National Park News Release
Release date: Immediate
>
todds_hiking_guide
Wouldn’t surprise me if they soon develop a taste for California Condor eggs.
-Todd
— In Yahoo Canyons Group, “RAM” wrote:
This was a fascinating read. Biological solutions always seem to have unintended consequences. Someone here (POFR?) mentioned that native species have had trouble reestablishing after the Tammies are gone. Time will tell. Tammies were and are a big problem. lets hope bigger concerns don’t replace them
Grand Canyon National Park News Release > Release date: Immediate >